![]() |
CIEL and the World Trade Organization |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Established on January 1, 1995, the WTO provides a forum for implementing the multilateral trading system, negotiating new trade agreements and resolving trade disputes. The Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization incorporates the original General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) which continues to apply to issues not covered by the more specific agreements negotiated during the Uruguay Round. It also includes specific agreements that cover many trade-related issues including: technical barriers to trade, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, trade-related investment measures, subsidies and countervailing measures, intellectual property rights, and agriculture. In November 1999, in the "battle of Seattle," the World Trade Organization emerged from its discreet headquarters on the shore of Lake Geneva to become a household name across the United States and worldwide. At the WTO Ministerial in Seattle, negotiations to launch a new round of global trade talks collapsed in the face of frustration from a range of excluded interests. These included developing countries, many of whose poorest citizens have seen no benefit from previous liberalization, as well as environmentalists and labor groups, who flooded the streets with tens of thousands of protestors. CIEL attended the Ministerial to push for reforms both within the US and at the WTO to ensure that trade rules incorporate the values of sustainable development. In preparation for the Ministerial, CIEL and Greenpeace International released Safe Trade in the 21st Century, which includes case studies on the disputes and potential disputes under the WTO. CIEL and 12 US Environmental groups outlined reforms needed in WTO and US policies and procedures in a July 1999 letter to the US Government. The groups argued that the US and WTO should assess the environmental impacts of trade rules, reform existing trade rules so that they avoid interfering with environmental protections, and halt expansion of the jurisdiction of the WTO so that it stays within its proper sphere of trade policy and leaves environmental regulation to the appropriate authorities. Participating in Trade Dispute Resolution CIEL is seeking to participate in the WTO dispute settlement system in order to ensure that international trade law and policymaking respect and do not conflict with principles of sustainable development. With the failure of the WTO's Committee on Trade and Environment to resolve key issues, the dispute resolution system has become the venue for policy development by default. CIEL is actively pursuing NGO participation in the dispute settlement process at the WTO, most recently achieving a victory for civil society in the high profile Shrimp/Turtle Dispute by submitting precedent-setting amicus briefs to the Dispute Settlement Body. More information about the dispute and CIEL's involvement is available on the Shrimp-Turtle Page. Public Participation As was evident in Seattle, the public has legitimate concerns with the work of the WTO and deserves to be part of the trade policy-making process. Currently the international process is almost entirely closed to public scrutiny or participation. The first steps toward a more transparent WTO are:
In addition to submissions to the Dispute Settlement Body and advocacy
directed toward key WTO Members, particularly the US, CIEL is promoting
participation through lectures, seminars and publications such as the
Handbook for Obtaining Documents from the World Trade Organization (available
at http://www.ictsd.org/html/arcpubpart.htm)
and A Proposed Agreement on Public Participation and Transparency Within
the WTO. Additional Materials:
This page last updated on 26 April 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||