The Hong Kong Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization
December 22, 2005
Environmental issues, addressed only tangentially at the Sixth Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO), will be among the difficult topics left on the table for 2006. While some progress was made on disciplining fisheries subsidies, discussions and decisions over other environmental issues were postponed. In particular, topics that remain highly controversial include: ensuring a mutually supportive relationship between WTO rules and multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), identifying environmental goods for the reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers, and introducing disclosure requirements for inventions using genetic resources and traditional knowledge in the Agreement on Trade-related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement).
Leaving the difficult decisions for 2006
Last week’s WTO Ministerial meeting resulted in a deal lacking both specific numbers and formulae for cutting tariffs and subsidies. But the 149 Members did commit to pursue the Doha Round of trade negotiations, which is planned to conclude by the end of 2006 (after the original January 1, 2005 deadline was missed). Additionally, in agriculture developing countries achieved the establishment of 2013 as the end-date for eliminating agricultural export subsidies. However, the question of modalities remains open. Similarly, there was some agreement on cotton, as well as on the least-developed countries’ request for duty- and quota-free market access. Here too, however, it is unclear what concrete benefits the new commitments will achieve. Finally, although developing countries managed to resist the proposed mandatory text on services, the services text continues to pose potential threats to developing countries’ policy space for sustainable development.
Environment-related issues in Hong Kong
With the discussions focusing on a limited set of issues that needed to be resolved in order for the negotiations to move forward in other areas, a number of other issues, including environment-related ones, were not discussed, or were only discussed tangentially. Paragraph 51 of the Doha Mandate calls on Members to bring environmental and developmental considerations into all aspects of the negotiations. At this stage, it seems that negotiations are not fulfilling this mandate: environmental considerations were absent in the ongoing negotiations on agriculture, non-agricultural market access (NAMA) and services. The negotiators also chose not to focus on the specific environmental mandates of the Doha Round, which include:
- the relationship between WTO rules and multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs);
- the issue of environmental goods and services;
- the relationship between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the TRIPS Agreement; and
- fisheries subsidies.
Relationship between WTO rules and trade-related measures in MEAs
The relationship between WTO rules and MEAs was not expected to be a topic for discussion in Hong Kong. In a surprise move, however, the European Communities indicated the desire to discuss this relationship when the meeting was already underway. In the end, however, the issue was left out of the Hong Kong negotiations.
Environmental goods and services
As expected, the issue of environmental goods and services was most actively discussed. Paragraph 31 (iii) of the Doha Mandate calls on Members to reduce or eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers on environmentally beneficial goods and services. In this context, the negotiators continued their discussion on whether to use a ‘list approach’ (which would identify a list of specific environmental goods), or an alternative approach, including India’s ‘environmental project approach’ (which would allow countries to reduce or eliminate tariffs on goods linked to environmental projects designated by a national authority). No consensus was reached on how to move forward, however, and the negotiations resulted in a short instruction to Members to “expeditiously complete the work” under Paragraph 31(iii).
Disclosure requirements
Despite calls from several developing countries for the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration to pave the way for negotiations on the issues pertaining to relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD, particularly in relation to disclosure requirements, the final text maintains the ambiguity that has led some developed countries to deny the need to negotiate an amendment to the TRIPS Agreement. For example, discussions on the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD are set to continue under Doha Paragraph 19, as well as in the context of implementation issues, on which countries have requested consultations to intensify and have established 31 July 2006 as a deadline for appropriate action.
Fisheries Subsidies
The issue of fisheries subsidies received some attention from the media, as a result of a high-level press conference convened by the UN Environment Programme and the World Wildlife Fund. But the section of the draft text on WTO rules, which covers anti-dumping, subsidies and countervailing measures, including fisheries subsidies, remained unchanged in Hong Kong.
The text calls on Members to strengthen disciplines on fisheries subsidies, including by identifying and prohibiting subsidies that contribute to over-capacity and over-fishing. The explicit link between fisheries subsidies to over-capacity and over-fishing was an important achievement in the lead-up to Hong Kong. The effectiveness and the relevance of this acknowledgement will depend on the specific language that will be used in the final deal.
Watching the environment in 2006
The discussions at the WTO will continue to focus primarily on the agriculture, non-agricultural market access (NAMA) and services. In all of these negotiations, CIEL will continue to be watchful of potential environmental and social impacts. For example, how will the liberalization of forest products affect forest management in poorer countries? And can and will these potential problems be addressed?
The specific environmental issues identified in the Doha mandate are likely to receive less attention, but will be addressed in one way or another before the end of the negotiating round. In addition, on issues such as disclosure requirements, the active participation of the environmental community is fundamental to ensuring intellectual property rules do not continue to undermine the effective implementation of the CBD. Thus, the environmental community must stay engaged and vigilant to ensure that
the outcome is the best possible.
The Relationship between WTO rules and MEAs: Ensuring that the WTO does not weaken MEAs
The environmental community will be watchful so that the issue of the relationship between WTO rules and MEAs not be used as a bargaining chip in other areas of negotiations. It is well known that developing countries fear certain outcomes of paragraph 31(i). Developed countries should not use this fear to strengthen their negotiating power in other areas: the environment cannot be traded away.
In this context, CIEL will carefully monitor and influence the various potential outcomes of the MEA-related mandate. In particular, while offering limited opportunities for strengthening MEAs, the language of paragraph
31(i) also involves some risk that the status of MEAs may be weakened, and any such outcome must be avoided. It is essential to keep in mind that specific negotiated terms and phrases will ultimately influence any decision of the WTO dispute settlement body involving an MEA.
Environmental Goods: Encouraging the use of environmentally beneficial goods
CIEL will actively engage the discussions relating to the negotiations on environmental goods and services. These negotiations are not just about market access – those are already covered in the Negotiating Group on
Market Access – but have environmental goals. CIEL is of the view that any discussion here should also incorporate goods that are produced or harvested in an environmentally preferential manner, including organic agriculture or environmentally sustainable forest management, areas of primary interest for many developing countries.
Disclosure Requirements: Ensuring a mutually supportive relationship between the CBD and the TRIPS Agreement
Intellectual property-related issues have been identified as a fundamental component of the development dimension of the Doha Round of negotiations. In particular, developing countries have highlighted the importance of ensuring the TRIPS Agreement does not undermine the CBD, by allowing the granting of patents for inventions that use genetic material and associated knowledge without requiring compliance with its provisions. Because the CBD is considered the single most important international agreement designed to both protect biodiversity and ensure its sustainable use, promoting its effective implementation is also critical from the environmental perspective. The focus on disclosure requirements as a tool to ensure a mutual supportive relationship has received wide and cross-regional support in the Council for TRIPS, and is also in line with the most recent assessments by other international organizations, countries, academia, and civil society. CIEL will continue to monitor and actively contribute to negotiations towards an amendment to the TRIPS Agreement to ensure intellectual property rules promote sustainable development.
Fisheries Subsidies: Linking fisheries subsidies to over-capacity and over-fishing
The territory gained to address the fisheries subsidies in the WTO will also depend largely on the specific language used linking subsidies to over-capacity and over-fishing. CIEL intends to actively engage and support the groups that have spear-headed this issue with its legal drafting expertise.
From December 13-18, 2005, CIEL participated in the Sixth World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong, China. The meeting, held once every two years, brought together the trade ministers of over 140 countries, to assess progress to date on the Doha Development Agenda negotiations (due to conclude in 2006).
Since the 1990s, CIEL has worked to:
- ensure that global trade rules do not compromise the ability of local and national governments to address environmental and public health problems; and
- guarantee that such rules actively promote sustainable development, both in the the developing and the developed world.
CIEL staff attending the WTO Ministerial included Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Maria Julia Oliva and Marcos Orellana. CIEL hosted the following events:
“Environment and Trade Jurisprudence at the WTO: Linkages to the Negotiations” 13 December 2005, 11:00-13:00, NGO Centre, Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, Room 408
Organized by the CIEL and the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests & Landscape, this panel discussion focused on trade and environment cases and the linkages to the ongoing negotiations at the WTO. During the panel, CIEL launched its new book, ENVIRONMENT AND TRADE: A GUIDE TO WTO JURISPRUDENCE (EARTHSCAN, 2005). The speakers at the event included Mitsuo Matushita (Former WTO Appellate Body Member), Tiyanjana Mphepo (South Centre), Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder (CIEL), Brendan McGivern (White & Case International Trade), and David Waskow (Friends of the Earth, U.S.).
For more information, please see
“Disclosure of Origin – a Deal Maker in the Doha Round?” 14 December 2005, 16:45-19:00, Hong Kong Exhibition Centre, Room 401
Organized by IUCN – World Conservation Union, Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales (IDDRI), CIEL, and ICTSD, this panel focused on the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the protection of traditional knowledge (TK) and folklore, as mandated in Paragraph 19 of the Doha Declaration, which also instructs the TRIPS Council to look at the relevant positions of the TRIPS Agreement, Articles 27.3(b) and 71.1. This panel proposed solutions on how to progress the debate on disclosure of origin in the TRIPS Council to determine potential dealmakers in the current round of negotiations.
For more information, including the agenda and brief biographies of the speakers, please visit:
http://www.ictsd.org/ministerial/hongkong/tds/agenda/05-12-14/session03.1_disclosure_origin.htm
“The Rush to Regionalism: Trade Integration’s impact on Peace and the Environment” 16 December 2005, 10:15-12:45, Hong Kong Exhibition Centre, Room 401
Organized by Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), and CIEL, this panel discussed the recent and rapid increase in regional trade agreements and the implications for the multilateral trading system and sustainable development. Among the speakers were Marcos Orellana, who provided an overview of approaches and trends to environmental protection in regional and bilateral trade agreements, and Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, who discussed the interrelationship between environmental approaches under the WTO and trends at the regional and bilateral levels.
For more information, including the agenda and brief biographies of the speakers, please visit: http://www.ictsd.org/ministerial/hongkong/tds/agenda/05-1216/session07.2_rush_to_regionalism.htm
In addition, CIEL staff spoke at the following events:
“The Right(s) Approach for Gender Equality, Environment and Development: Recapturing Policy Coherence Around Trade” December 14, 2005, 10:00-12:00 Hong Kong Conference and Exhibition Centre, NGO Centre, Room 409
Co-sponsored by the International Gender and Trade Network and the Heinrich Boell Foundation, this panel discussion examined policy coherence around trade from a human and gender rights perspective. Speakers included Gigi Francisco, IGTN Asia/DAWN; Maria Pia Hernandez, IGTN; Oduor Ongwen, Southern and Eastern African Trade Information and Negotiations Initiative (SEATINI); Maria Julia Oliva, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL); and Liane Schalatek, Heinrich Boll Foundation (moderator).
For more information, please visit:
“The Right(s) Approach for Gender Equality, Environment and Development: Recapturing Policy Coherence Around Trade”
December 17, 2005 – 9:30-12:00 The Knutsford Hotel, Second Floor – 39 Kimberley Road, Tsim Sha Sui, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Co-sponsored by the International Gender and Trade Network and the Heinrich Boell Foundation, this panel was held outside the WTO Ministerial, and open to all. Speakers included Graciela Rodriguez, LAGTN; Kinhide Mushakoji, International Movement Against all Forms of Discrimation and Racism (IMADR); Humberto Ortiz Roca, Comision Episcopal de Accion Social; Maria Julia Oliva, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL); and Liane Schalatek, Heinrich B?ll Foundation (moderator).
For more information, please visit: http://www.igtn.org/page/events/
“Rethinking International Investment Law in the Era of Globalization: IISD’s Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development” 17 December 2005, 14:15-16:30, Hong Kong Exhibition Centre, Room 403
This panel focused on IISD”s Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development. Among the speakers were Marcos Orellana (CIEL) and Richard Newfarmer (World Bank), who were participants on a panel discussion of the text.
For more information, including the agenda and brief biographies of the
speakers, please visit: http://www.ictsd.org/ministerial/hongkong/tds/agenda/05-12-17/session11.4_rethinking_international.htm
Publications presented by CIEL at the Ministerial include: Environment and Trade: A WTO Guide to Jurisprudence
For more information, please contact: Marcos Orellana (morellana@ciel.org).